BioTech + Art
Overall I find myself having mixed feelings towards the topic of this week. Humans infusing technology into our biological world was a natural progression of our technological advancements. However when we manipulate and disfigure living creatures in our own world for the purpose of art, I feel that we have crossed the line. When professor Vesna talks about Marta Dimineza's art and what she did to the butterflies it made me sick.

That is not to say that I am entirely oppose to the idea of us mixing technology with nature to create art. I would have no issue with an artist using plants or any sort of vegetation to portray their artistic vision, in fact I would not even mind if they used a dead animal. My issue is when another living creature has to go through pain and suffering for something like art. It is for this reason that I believe that artists that use biotechnology should have very strict rules in regards to the things they can work with.
On the flip side I feel that scientists in research/academia should have little to no restrictions as far as the use of biotechnology. This is because unlike artists, certain discovers that can be made through science has the capability of saving lives and changing our world for the better. However, that is not to say that artist don't have any value in a society, but rather they can't be compared with the world changing capabilities of scientists.

Vesna, Victoria. "5bioart pt2" YouTube, UC Online, 17 May 2012.
Vesna, Victoria. “5 BioArt pt3.” YouTube, UC Online, 17 May 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=3EpD3np1S2g.
esna, Victoria. "5bioart pt1 1280x720" YouTube, UC Online, 18 Sept. 2018.
Kelty, Chris. “Meanings of Participation: Outlaw Biology?”. Web. 6 May. 2019.
“Classes Cancelled.” History of Biotechnology, www.lonestar.edu/history-of-biotechnology.htm.

That is not to say that I am entirely oppose to the idea of us mixing technology with nature to create art. I would have no issue with an artist using plants or any sort of vegetation to portray their artistic vision, in fact I would not even mind if they used a dead animal. My issue is when another living creature has to go through pain and suffering for something like art. It is for this reason that I believe that artists that use biotechnology should have very strict rules in regards to the things they can work with.
On the flip side I feel that scientists in research/academia should have little to no restrictions as far as the use of biotechnology. This is because unlike artists, certain discovers that can be made through science has the capability of saving lives and changing our world for the better. However, that is not to say that artist don't have any value in a society, but rather they can't be compared with the world changing capabilities of scientists.
Vesna, Victoria. "5bioart pt2" YouTube, UC Online, 17 May 2012.
Vesna, Victoria. “5 BioArt pt3.” YouTube, UC Online, 17 May 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=3EpD3np1S2g.
esna, Victoria. "5bioart pt1 1280x720" YouTube, UC Online, 18 Sept. 2018.
Kelty, Chris. “Meanings of Participation: Outlaw Biology?”. Web. 6 May. 2019.
“Classes Cancelled.” History of Biotechnology, www.lonestar.edu/history-of-biotechnology.htm.
Comments
Post a Comment